<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Have the Worst Beta Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/</link>
	<description>Building Product Management from the Ground Up by Paul Young</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beta Testing in a SaaS World &#124; Cloud Computing &#38; Bad Behaviour</title>
		<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1902</link>
		<dc:creator>Beta Testing in a SaaS World &#124; Cloud Computing &#38; Bad Behaviour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbeautiful.com/?p=107#comment-1902</guid>
		<description>[...] read with interest a comment on one of the posts from the Product Beautiful blog.Â  The topic of the post was about the 5 types of beta programs that organisations commonly end up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read with interest a comment on one of the posts from the Product Beautiful blog.Â  The topic of the post was about the 5 types of beta programs that organisations commonly end up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Honda</title>
		<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Honda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbeautiful.com/?p=107#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>You should look at the company called VOConline</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should look at the company called VOConline</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cranky Product Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cranky Product Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbeautiful.com/?p=107#comment-1648</guid>
		<description>Apologies. The Cranky Product Manager did not realize you already had a post outlining and describing 5 types of Beta tests, including one called the Google Beta.

Alas, the Cranky Product Manager posted her one too-similar list yesterday. She honestly was not aware of your article ahead of time and apologies for any overlap in content or concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies. The Cranky Product Manager did not realize you already had a post outlining and describing 5 types of Beta tests, including one called the Google Beta.</p>
<p>Alas, the Cranky Product Manager posted her one too-similar list yesterday. She honestly was not aware of your article ahead of time and apologies for any overlap in content or concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Fine</title>
		<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1588</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Fine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbeautiful.com/?p=107#comment-1588</guid>
		<description>Hilarious! As the author of &quot;Beta Testing for Better Software&quot; and one of the founders of the beta testing firm Centercode, I have to say these are just the tip of the iceberg.

There is the &quot;Process Demands It Beta&quot; in which the company is committed to beta testing; includes it in the schedule but doesn&#039;t care what comes out of it.

The &quot;Good News Beta&quot; is when the testing is done to just to grab marketing data and testimonials. Sadly, the bugs and issues get neglected to make a release date.

The &quot;Bed News Beta&quot; is the opposite where they use the beta test to help EOL a product. The product manager thinks a new version is needed and ignores key data that could help future development.

I could go on forever with examples of common beta mistakes, misuse and issues. I have conducted more than 500 of these tests and I have to say, it is one of the most undervalued processes in product development.

Good product managers embrace beta testing and make the most of it. The results of a good beta test are invaluable in so many ways. Thanks for the fun read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious! As the author of &#8220;Beta Testing for Better Software&#8221; and one of the founders of the beta testing firm Centercode, I have to say these are just the tip of the iceberg.</p>
<p>There is the &#8220;Process Demands It Beta&#8221; in which the company is committed to beta testing; includes it in the schedule but doesn&#8217;t care what comes out of it.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Good News Beta&#8221; is when the testing is done to just to grab marketing data and testimonials. Sadly, the bugs and issues get neglected to make a release date.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Bed News Beta&#8221; is the opposite where they use the beta test to help EOL a product. The product manager thinks a new version is needed and ignores key data that could help future development.</p>
<p>I could go on forever with examples of common beta mistakes, misuse and issues. I have conducted more than 500 of these tests and I have to say, it is one of the most undervalued processes in product development.</p>
<p>Good product managers embrace beta testing and make the most of it. The results of a good beta test are invaluable in so many ways. Thanks for the fun read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbeautiful.com/?p=107#comment-1473</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why do you let sales sell anything that hasn’t been released yet?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure several readers will empathise with me when I say that&#8217;s more easily said than done&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Locke</title>
		<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1471</link>
		<dc:creator>David Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbeautiful.com/?p=107#comment-1471</guid>
		<description>Why do you let sales sell anything that hasn&#039;t been released yet? I&#039;ve seen that one kill a company. It was like the current release had never been released. Everyone wanted the next release. In the meantime, we had to get more investor money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you let sales sell anything that hasn&#8217;t been released yet? I&#8217;ve seen that one kill a company. It was like the current release had never been released. Everyone wanted the next release. In the meantime, we had to get more investor money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What does &#8220;beta&#8221; mean for Software as a Service? (Jarrett House North)</title>
		<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>What does &#8220;beta&#8221; mean for Software as a Service? (Jarrett House North)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbeautiful.com/?p=107#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>[...] Johnson at Pragmatic Marketing points to an interesting article on five different types of betas. One of Steve&#8217;s commenters suggests there is a sixth kind, the SaaS beta: &#8230;ratchet up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Johnson at Pragmatic Marketing points to an interesting article on five different types of betas. One of Steve&#8217;s commenters suggests there is a sixth kind, the SaaS beta: &#8230;ratchet up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ray Hopkin</title>
		<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ray Hopkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbeautiful.com/?p=107#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a twist on the &#039;Google&#039; beta: the SaaS beta. Develop or convert your products to a hosted/SaaS model, ratchet up your release cycles to monthly, then you can call it a &#039;release&#039; or a &#039;beta.&#039; Either way customers get their hands on the new functionality. 

The SaaS model is great in many ways, but the traditional concept of beta changes dramatically. -Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a twist on the &#8216;Google&#8217; beta: the SaaS beta. Develop or convert your products to a hosted/SaaS model, ratchet up your release cycles to monthly, then you can call it a &#8216;release&#8217; or a &#8216;beta.&#8217; Either way customers get their hands on the new functionality. </p>
<p>The SaaS model is great in many ways, but the traditional concept of beta changes dramatically. -Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopal Shenoy</title>
		<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopal Shenoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbeautiful.com/?p=107#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

Great article. In my previous company, to avoid confusion between alpha and beta internally, we had the following definition:

Alpha is to find from customers whether you build the right thing to solve their problem - focus on functionality and not bugs (finding bugs is just a bonus)

Beta is to find if you build the right thing right - the focus here is nothing but finding bugs and fixing them.

Gopal
http://productmanagementtips.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>Great article. In my previous company, to avoid confusion between alpha and beta internally, we had the following definition:</p>
<p>Alpha is to find from customers whether you build the right thing to solve their problem &#8211; focus on functionality and not bugs (finding bugs is just a bonus)</p>
<p>Beta is to find if you build the right thing right &#8211; the focus here is nothing but finding bugs and fixing them.</p>
<p>Gopal<br />
<a href="http://productmanagementtips.com" rel="nofollow">http://productmanagementtips.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Reader: 7June08 » The Productologist</title>
		<link>http://www.productbeautiful.com/2008/05/28/how-to-have-the-worst-beta-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1462</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reader: 7June08 » The Productologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbeautiful.com/?p=107#comment-1462</guid>
		<description>[...]  How to Have the Worst Beta Ever [Product Beautiful] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  How to Have the Worst Beta Ever [Product Beautiful] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
